SAT考试将于2016年改革，SAT官方College Board于2015年1月9日释放新SAT考试最新样题，
Questions 15–19 are based on the following passage.
This passage is adapted from a speech delivered by Congresswoman Barbara Jordan of Texas on July 25, 1974, as a member of the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives. In the passage, Jordan discusses how and when a United States president may be impeached, or charged with serious offenses, while in office. Jordan’s speech was delivered in the context of impeachment hearings against then president Richard M. Nixon.
Today, I am an inquisitor. An hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that I feel right now. My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution.
“Who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?” “The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men.”* And that’s what we’re talking about. In other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust.
It is wrong, I suggest, it is a misreading of the Constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the President should be removed from office. The Constitution doesn’t say that. The powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive.The division between the two branches of the legislature, the House and the Senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge—the framers of this Constitution were very astute.They did not make the accusers and the judges...the same person.
We know the nature of impeachment. We’ve been talking about it a while now. It is chiefly designed for the President and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. It is designed to “bridle” the executive if he engages in excesses. “It is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men.”* The framers confided in the Congress the power, if need be, to remove the President in order to strike a delicate balance between a President swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive.
The nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation of powers maxim. The Federal Convention of 1787 said that. Itlimited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors, and discounted and opposed the term “maladministration.” “It is to be used only for great misdemeanors,” so it was said in the North Carolina ratification convention. And in the Virginia ratification convention: “We do not trust our liberty to a particular branch. We need one branch to check the other.”
...The North Carolina ratification convention: “No one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity.” “Prosecutions of impeachments will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community,” said Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, number 65. “We divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.”* I do not mean political parties in that sense.
The drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term “high crime[s] and misdemeanors.” Of the impeachment process, it was Woodrow Wilson who said that “Nothing short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. Indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can.”
Common sense would be revolted if we engaged upon this process for petty reasons. Congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. Pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such overwhelming problems. So today we’re not being petty. We’re trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a bigone.
*Jordan quotes from Federalist No. 65, an essay by Alexander Hamilton, published in 1788, on the powers of the United States Senate, including the power to decide cases of impeachment against a president of the United States.
阅读与查看题目请点击【下一页】#p#副标题#e#
Question 15 of 24
Select an Answer
The stance Jordan takes in the passage is best described as that of
A
an idealist setting forth principles.
B
an advocate seeking a compromise position.
C
an observer striving for neutrality.
D
a scholar researching a historical controversy.
Question 16 of 24
Select an Answer
The main rhetorical effect of the series of three phrases beginning in line 4 (“the diminution, the subversion, the destruction”) is to
A
convey with increasing intensity the seriousness of the threat Jordan sees to the Constitution.
B
clarify that Jordan believes the Constitution was first weakened, then sabotaged, then broken.
C
indicate that Jordan thinks the Constitution is prone to failure in three distinct ways.
D
propose a three-part agenda for rescuing the Constitution from the current crisis.
Question 17 of 24
Select an Answer
As used in line 29, “channeled” most nearly means
A
worn.
B
sent.
C
constrained.
D
siphoned.
Question 18 of 24
Select an Answer
In lines 37–41 (“Prosecutions...sense”), what is the most likely reason Jordan draws a distinction between two types of “parties”?
A
To counter the suggestion that impeachment is or should be about partisan politics
B
To disagree with Hamilton’s claim that impeachment proceedings excite passions
C
To contend that Hamilton was too timid in his support for the concept of impeachment
D
To argue that impeachment cases are decided more on the basis of politics than on justice
Question 19 of 24
Select an Answer
Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?
A
Lines 11–14 (“It...office”)
B
Lines 17–19 (“The division...astute”)
C
Lines 42–44 (“The drawing...misdemeanors”)
D
Lines 50–52(“Congress...transportation”)
正确答案详见【下一页】#p#副标题#e#
Question 15 of 24
正确答案：A
View Correct Answer
Choice A is the best answer. Jordan helps establish her idealism by declaring that she is an “inquisitor” (line 1) and that her “faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total”(line 2). At numerous points in the passage, Jordan sets forth principles (e.g., “The powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive,” inlines 15–17) and makes reference to important documents that do the same, including the U.S. Constitution and Federalist No. 65.
Choice B is not the best answer because although Jordan is advocating a position, there is no evidence in the passage that she is seeking a compromise position. Indeed, she notes that she is “not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution” (lines 3–5), indicating that she is not seeking compromise.
Choice C is not the best answer because Jordan is a participant (“an inquisitor,” line 1) in the proceedings, not a mere observer. Indeed, she notes that she is “not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution” (lines 3–5).
Choice D is not the best answer because Jordan is identified as a congresswoman and (“an inquisitor,” line 1), not a scholar, and because she is primarily discussing events happening at the moment, not researching an unidentified historical controversy. While she refers to historical documents and individuals, her main emphasis is on the (then) present impeachment hearings.
Question Difficulty:
HARD
Passage Complexity:
HIGHER
Objective:
Students must use information and ideas in the passage to determine the speaker’s perspective.
Question 16 of 24
正确答案：A
View Correct Answer
Choice A is the best answer because the quoted phrases — building from “diminution” to “subversion” to “destruction” — suggest the increasing seriousness of the threat Jordan sees to the Constitution.
Choice B is not the best answer because the passage offers no evidence that the quoted phrases refer to three different events that happened in a strict sequence. It is more reasonable to infer from the passage that Jordan sees “diminution,” “subversion,” and “destruction” as differing degrees to which the Constitution could be undermined. Moreover, the passage suggests that Jordan sees these three things as products of the same action or series of actions, not as three distinct stages in a process.
Choice C is not the best answer because the passage offers no evidence that the quoted phrases refer to three distinct ways in which the Constitution is prone to failure. It is more reasonable to infer from the passage that Jordan sees “diminution,” “subversion,” and “destruction” as differing degrees to which the Constitution could be undermined. Moreover, the passage suggests that Jordan sees these three things as products of the same action or series of actions, not as three distinct “ways.”
Choice D is not the best answer because the passage offers no evidence that the quoted phrases refer to three unique elements of a proposal to resolve a crisis. It is more reasonable to infer from the passage that Jordan sees “diminution,” “subversion,” and “destruction” as differing degrees to which the Constitution could be undermined. Moreover, the passage suggests that Jordan sees these three things as products of the same action or series of actions, not as three distinct “parts.”
Question Difficulty:
MEDIUM
Passage Complexity:
HIGHER
Objective:
Students must determine the main rhetorical effect of the speaker’s choice of words.
Question 17 of 24
正确答案：C
View Correct Answer
Choice C is the best answer because the context makes clear that the kind of “exception” (line 29)Jordan describes should be narrowly constrained, or limited. As lines 31–32 indicate, the Federal Convention of 1787 “limited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors, and discounted and opposed the term ‘maladministration,’” presumably because the term implied too broad a scope for the exception.
Choice A is not the best answer because while “channeled” sometimes means “worn,” it would make no sense in context to say that the kind of“exception” (line 29) Jordan describes should be narrowly worn.
Choice B is not the best answer because while “channeled” sometimes means “sent,” it would make no sense in context to say that the kind of“exception” (line 29) Jordan describes should be narrowly sent.
Choice D is not the best answer because while “channeled” sometimes means “siphoned,” it would make no sense in context to say that the kind of“exception” (line 29) Jordan describes should be narrowly siphoned.
Question Difficulty:
MEDIUM
Passage Complexity:
HIGHER
Objective:
Students must determine the meaning of a word in the context in which it appears.
Question 18 of 24
正确答案：A
View Correct Answer
Choice A is the best answer. Jordan is making a distinction between two types of “parties”: the informal associations to which Alexander Hamilton refers and formal, organized political parties such as the modern-day Republican and Democratic parties. Jordan anticipates that listeners to her speech might misinterpret her use of Hamilton’s quotation as suggesting that she thinks impeachment is essentially a tool of organized political parties to achieve partisan ends, with one party attacking and another defending the president. Throughout the passage and notably in the seventh paragraph (lines 42–48), Jordan makes clear that she thinks impeachment should be reserved only for the most serious of offenses — ones that should rankle people of any political affiliation.
Choice B is not the best answer because Jordan offers no objection to Hamilton’s notion that impeachment proceedings excite passions. Indeed, she quotes Hamilton extensively in a way that indicates that she fundamentally agrees with his view on impeachment. Moreover, she acknowledges that her own speech is impassioned — that she feels a “solemnness” (line 2) and a willingness to indulge in “hyperbole” (line 1).
Choice C is not the best answer because Jordan offers no objection to Hamilton’s level of support for the concept of impeachment. Indeed, she quotes Hamilton extensively in a way that indicates that she fundamentally agrees with his view on impeachment.
Choice D is not the best answer because Jordan suggests that she and her fellow members of Congress are “trying to be big” (line 54), or high- minded, rather than decide the present case on the basis of politics. Indeed, throughout the last four paragraphs of the passage (lines 29–55), she elaborates on the principled, just basis on which impeachment should proceed. Moreover, throughout the passage Jordan is focused on the present impeachment hearings, not on the justice or injustice of impeachments generally.
Question Difficulty:
MEDIUM
Passage Complexity:
HIGHER
Objective:
Students must interpret the speaker’s line of reasoning
Question 19 of 24
正确答案：C
View Correct Answer
Choice C is the best answer because in lines42–44, Jordan draws a contrast between political motivations and “high crime[s] and misdemeanors” as the basis for impeachment and argues that impeachment “must proceed within the confines” of the latter concept. These lines thus serve as the best evidence for the answer to the previous question.
Choice A is not the best answer because lines11–14 only address a misconception that Jordan contends some people have about what a vote for impeachment means. These lines thus do not serve as the best evidence for the answer to the previous question.
Choice B is not the best answer because lines17–19 only speak to a division of responsibility between the two houses of the U.S. Congress. These lines thus do not serve as the best evidence for the answer to the previous question.
Choice D is not the best answer because lines50–52 (“Congress...transportation”) serve mainly to indicate that the U.S. Congress has an extensive and important agenda. These lines thus do not serve as the best evidence for the answer to the previous question.
Question Difficulty:
HARD
Passage Complexity:
HIGHER
Objective:
Students must determine which portion of the passage provides the best evidence for the answer to question 4.