SAT作文评分时，每个评分者通常会对文章给出1分至6分的整数分数，6分为阅卷老师能给出的最高分。想要有针对性地准备和练习SAT文章写作，必须非常清楚其评分标准。本文将列举几篇文章，并精析这些文章的优缺点，帮助读者们更好地理解极为重要的评分标准。接下来就一起来看看今天SAT考试内容：通过SAT写作评分标准
真题作文例解
2012年1月的SAT Essay真题为" Should people be treated according to what they are capable of achieving instead of what they have actually done? (应该以潜力还是应该以成就来看待人)?"。很遗憾，下面这篇考场作文并没有在规定时间内完成。那么，对于这篇没有完成的作文，评分者评了多少分呢?
In society, it is generally true that those who have fulfilled people’s expectations receive fame and money in return, but those who have tremendous potential but always disappoint the public by failing to meet their expectations receive nothing. This rule may seem pretty obvious to some people, but I do not think it is fair.
Liu Xiang is a famous runner in China. We have also seen him as the pride of China until recently. Back then in 2004 Olympics, Liu Xiang astonished the world by getting the first place, Chinese were so excited. Then we start to praise him as a “god”. He broke the curse that “Asian people cannot run fast enough to get an Olympic champion.” We expect more from this “hero” of China ever since, and our expectations have turned into a burden on Liu’s shoulder. He is the only “hero” of running in China, but he is also a human. Four years later, Liu started the same competition in Olympics, the Beijing Olympic Games. This was a very special event for Chinese, the first time that Olympics was held in China. Chinese people hoped that Liu was capable of winning this game in our own country again. But Liu got injured just before the competition, and he quit just at the moment of starting the race. Chinese got very frustrated, we could not believe the truth that our one and only “hero” failed and we started to criticize that our hero is giving up as a coward. To me those criticisms are not fair for Liu has tried his best and gave his precious performance. We can see that he is capable of winning. We should not blame him for that. He is just a human too. He gives us the pride of being a Chinese, but we give him (305 words)
这篇文章的评分是4分，你猜对了吗?为什么没有完成的作文也可能及格呢(以满分为6分来计算，4分已经及格)?我们还是回顾一下评分标准，仔细分析这篇文章的特点。
虽然本文的开头可圈可点，但文章结构不完整这个硬伤也同样抢眼。另外，本文在时态方面有待做较大的改进。用词重复、句型不甚丰富、代词误用、词不达意等错误也比较明显。当然，本文之所以能评4分，而不是更低的分数，也反映了评卷者对诸如不完整的结构、不够优美的语言等瑕疵的容忍度。正如《SAT官方指南》上所说，评卷者受过严格的培训，他们很清楚考生面临着巨大的时间压力，并不会期待看到完美的文章，知道SAT考场作文相当于平常人们写作文时的第一稿(the first draft)，对错误有一定的包容度。
由于篇幅所限，本文就不再列举3分或以下的文章了。相信读者通过阅读以上几篇示例文章，已经基本了解本文作者想要强调的要点——评点一篇文章的好坏，并不能只从一个维度入手，而是需要从“内容”、“结构”、“语言”三方面斟酌。希望考生们谨记这些评分关键词，争取从各方面满足阅卷者的期待。最后，祝考生们获得SAT高分!
以上就是今天网带给大家的SAT考试内容：通过SAT写作真题作文理解SAT写作评分标准 更多SAT精彩内容，可以参看网论坛。