2016年9月24日的雅思考试已经结束，各位同学们发挥的怎么样呢? 下面是小编为大家整理的2016年9月24日雅思写作考试真题详细解析,供大家参考学习，希望能给大家带来帮助。
TASK 1
题型：
表格图
题目：
关于五个国家的二氧化碳排放量 (表格图)，(具体题目及范文待补充)。
相似题目：The table shows carbon dioxide (CO2) production in five countries in 2005 and2006. (2012-6-16)
题目解析：
1)题目翻译
该表格比较了五个国家中二氧化碳在2005和2006年的排放量情况。选取主要的特征对信息进行概括，在相关的地方进行比较。
2)要素回忆
静态表格，表格各栏分别比较了各国人均二氧化碳排放量，2005及2006年各国二氧化碳总排放量及两年间的变化情况。
3)写作指导
(1) 表格中各纵栏数据可按照从高到低排序顺序进行排列比较，并突出强调最高、最低等特殊数值;
(2) 表格各横栏间可比性不强，不需要在中途将2005年及2006年的数据进行单独比较，因为表格最后一纵栏有特别交代两个年份中数据的变化情况，如果将太多数据集中在一起进行比较反而会出现较混乱的场面; 3) 结尾段可结合表格整体情况，给出整体性的汇总特征或强调某一国的特殊情况。
4)重点表达式
the -est / most(最高级) …, (closely) followed by… What came next be……be close behind lie last
5)推荐练习
剑桥真题7,test1; 剑桥真题6, test2
除此之外，考生也可以参考下面一篇类似的考官范文。
题目：The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
图片113
范文：
该图表从三个不同方面展示了六个城市地铁系统的特点。The table demonstrates the features of the underground railway systems in 6 cities in three different aspects.
首先，这六个城市的地铁系统是按年代顺序开通的，其中伦敦是最早的(1863年)，而洛杉矶是最晚的(2001年)。地铁系统在20世纪进入全盛时期，四条地铁线路分别在巴黎(1900年)，东京(1927年)，华盛顿(1976年)，以及洛杉矶(1981年)建立起来。 First, the subway systems in the six cities were opened in time sequence with London being the earliest (in 1863) and Los Angeles the latest ( in 2001 ). The underground railway system had their prime time in the 20th century, which saw the construction of 4 underground railway systems respectively in Paris (1900), in Tokyo (1927), in Washington DC (1976), and in Los Angeles (1981).
第二，依照从伦敦到洛杉叽的排列顺序，也是根据建造地铁的年代顺序，这六个城市地铁线路长度基本上依次大幅降低。伦敦线路最长，394公里，巴黎第二，199公里，东京第三，155公里，华盛顿126公里。京都和洛杉叽最有趣，分别只有区区11公里和28公里，难与前四名相提并论。 Second, seen from London to Los Angeles, which happened to be in chronological order of subway construction, the above-mentioned six cities roughly revealed a trend of sharp decrease in the length of the subway route. London ranked No. 1 in this respect, with a length of 394km; Paris came next with 199km; Tokyo was No. 3 with 155km; Washington DC ranked No. 4 with 126 km. Kyoto and Los Angeles were the most interesting, with merely 11km and 28km respectively, nothing comparable with the top 4 cities.
第三，在这六个城市每年地铁运送乘客的数量上我们看到一些令人难以预料的数据。东京成为领头羊，有19亿2千7百万之多;巴黎名列第二，有11亿9千1百万;伦敦位居第三，为7亿7千5百万;华盛顿第四，1亿4千4百万;洛杉叽和京都分别是5千万和4千5百万。因此，与其它城市相比可见差距之大。Third, we see some really unexpected figures about the number of passengers transported by the subway system in these six cities. Tokyo took the lead with 1.927 billion; Paris came next with 1.191 billion; London was No. 3 with 775 million; Washington DC was No. 4 with 144 million. Los Angeles and Kyoto had 50 million and 45 million respectively. Therefore, we can see the big difference as compared with other cities.
总之，6个城市在地铁的建设历史、地铁长度和年运送旅客能力方面皆呈现出了很大的不同。Overall, the six cities revealed great differences in the history of subway construction, the length of subway lines and the yearly passenger transportation capability.
TASK 2
题材：
社会类
题目：
In many cities an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and they lack a sense of community. What are the causes? How to solve this problem?
分析：
该作文为报告类题型社会类题材。第一段可先明确文章结构。分析原因划分两段，分别当代生活节奏与尖端科技的普及角度出发。提出措施段分别从社区委员会，政府与媒体角度出发。
参考范文：
(Word Count: 264 )
Unsurprisingly, a growing number of citizens are thoughtless and indifferent to their neighbor contributing to undoubtedly, lacking a sense of community. The essay aims to explore looming reason and come up with effective measures to solve this phenomenon.
Firstly, the situation of individuals knowing little about their neighbors is mainly attributed to the pace of modern life. Under great living pressure, many people have to go to work early and share little time with their neighbors, especially those who live far from their workplaces because of traffic congestion. Besides, more and more people are accustomed to having meals in restaurants such as fast food restaurants instead of going back home, not to mention exhaustion they get after working the whole day, resulting in lower possibility of meeting and communicating with neighbors.
On the other hand, an easy access of cutting-edge functions of mobile phones such as online shopping and looking through twitter and so on leads to ignoring communication with familiar persons around them even sitting in front the table and having a meal, let alone spending time with neighbors.
It is high time to take constructive measures to prevent the phenomenon from getting worse. First and foremost, the community committee is suggested to organize innovative activities in the community t attract more residents to attend and recognize with each other. In addition, the government and major media are supposed to spread the significance of socializing with neighbors by various kinds (advertisements, such as TV commercials and bus posters, in order to strengthen individuals’awareness of maintaining harmonious relationship with neighbors.