雅思考生如果能正确使用雅思真题，合理利用，将会对自己的成绩有很大的好处。为此，小编下面就为大家奉上了2015年4月18日雅思写作真题回忆及答案解析，希望对大家有所帮助。
Task 1 table
A类小作文
分析：这篇文章数据很简单，也很少。但是要合理分段，并作出比较和总结。能遇到这篇文章，相信基本功扎实的同学一定能拿到理想的分数。
word count: 148
The table compares the ratio of men to women from six different districts in two separate years 1995 and 2005.
It can be seen from the table that many districts5 number of females experienced a downward trend，such as Asian, North America Oceania, central America Oceania, north America. The proportion of women in the population in North America decreased dramatically, which dipped from 103.9 in 1995 to 99.8 in 2005. As for north and central American Oceania, they had similar figures, both slipped by 3.2 and 2.5 respectively. In Asian, the ratio only went down by 0.4, which nearly 10 times less than that in North America.
Conversely, only two areas5 women population witnessed an increase in these two years. Europe^ proportion of women in population rose from 89.4 in 1995 to 92.8 in 2005. And the proportion in Africa only went up by 1.4 at the same period.
Task 2
题目类别 教育 提问方式 Discussion
考试题目
Some people think only best students should be rewarded, others think we should reward students who make progress.
分析:
418的题目也属于新题，论述类，两方面的观点都要涉及到，一般需要侧重讲每个观点的合理之处，缺点(不足之处)可以一笔带过。
SAMPLE:word count： 252
It is universally believed that providing students with many rewards is an effective way to improve academic performance. Although some would argue that only those top students are eligible to receive these rewards, I am in the camp that anyone who makes progress should be rewarded as well.
Firstly, advocates believe that it is reasonable to offer prizes to the high-level performers. This is because one needs to pay a great amount of effort than other classmates in order to earn a high grade in the exam. In addition, top performers normally act as a facilitator to encourage other students to work harder and they can create a competitive learning setting in the school.
However, rewarding top players merely is likely to result in some undesirable results in some occasions. The reason is that those best students are relatively few in the class. If we only pay attention to those few high-level learners and ignore the rest of the students, the enthusiasm for study might be reduced. Some opponents, therefore, feel that it is necessary for teachers to give certain awards to those who put forward reasonable efforts in study. The extrinsic reward provided to them is not only a recognition of their former performance, but also a motivator for further study since a sense of accomplishment can boost their confidence and help them become the high-level students eventually.
In conclusion, my view is that both types of students should be rewarded, which is beneficial for the learning environment in the campus.