雅思大作文中教育类在写作考试中很是常见，考生要做好应对措施。本文帮大家带来的雅思大作文范文[教育类话题篇]，并做了详细的解析。希望对大家的写作能力和写作思路方面有所提高。详见本文。
雅思作文题目：
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
范文：
Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.
Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching. Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.
I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only — changes should also be made in society as a whole, including education at the pre-university level. Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.
On the other hand, if the last 1.0% of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority’ sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.
一、话题类型：
教育类
二、题目类型：
观点类
三、题目简要内容：
大学在每个科目上应该接受同等数量的男女生。同意与否?
四、素材积累：
大学在每个科目上应该接受同等数量的男女生，如果是这样情况，考生要考虑好与不好两方面，为什么会出现男女比例失调，以及失调的原因是什么，并有什么办法去解决这种现象。
词汇：
gender-imbalanced性别比例失衡的
laudable值得赞赏的
draconian严厉的，苛刻的
underrepresented代表名额不足的
lose out to输给，被…所取代
五、论据积累：
大学在每个科目上应该接受同等数量的男女生
(1)原因：
工作就业机会不平等
上大学竞争大以及社会上所带有的偏见
(2)解决办法：
教育
对现有男女比例进行调整
(3)影响
非常优秀的男性得不到很好的发展空间
….
六、结构分析：
针对To what extent do you agree or disagree类雅思作文，考生的观点要明确。本题属于观点题型，考生可以同意，也可以不同意，也可以部分同意。但是，如果考生细心分析题目就可以看出题目中的in every subject表明观点上有些过分绝对化，所以考生在写作时进行反驳比较容易展开阐述。
第一段：
开头段是让步与反驳句型相结合来提出观点：认为大学没有必要在每一个学科都招收同等数量的男女学生，而是对现有的男女比例不平衡问题进行调整即可：
Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.
laudable 值得赞赏的
modest 适度的
severely 严重地
draconian 严厉的，苛刻的
imposition 征收，强加
第二段：
从社会现状的角度出发，分析为什么会在不同行业领域中男女比例失调：
(1)机会不平等：
Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching.
upper management and engineering 高级管理和工程
nursing, translating and primary school teaching 护理，翻译和小学教育
(2)上大学竞争以及社会偏见：
Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.
underrepresented 代表名额不足的
social stereotyping 社会定型
workforce n. 劳动力;工人总数，职工总数
follow suit 跟着做，学样
associated with 与..有关系，有联系
第三段：
进一步论述男女工作上的不均衡不应该仅仅依靠调整大学录取男女生的比例。整个社会也要做出行动，比如教育方面：
I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only — changes should also be made in society as a whole, including education at the pre-university level.
此外，也分析了如果硬性规定每个学科的男女生比例都必须相同可能会带来负面影响：
Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.(很有可能会导致许多非常能干且上进心强的男生被迫让位于一些在那些学科上不那么合格，而且可能也对将来从事这方面的工作兴趣不大的女生。)
take place in 发生
result in 导致，结果是
lose out to 输给，被…所取代
第四段：
结尾提出解决办法，即对男女招生比例进行微调：
On the other hand, if the last 1.0% of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority' sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.
allotments分配
reserved for为….保留
参考译文：
虽然应该赞赏社会上男女两性必须平等的观念，但我认为，和大学所有课程都严格实行男女生各占一半的规定相比，对一些严重的男女比例不平衡课程进行微调会更切合实际。
一些人觉得在高级管理和工程等领域女性人数偏少，也缺乏平等机会，而另一些人认为如果有更多的男子能够在诸如护理、翻译和小学教育等行业工作的话，可以更好地服务社会。这两种人都觉得产生这种情形不仅是因为上大学的竞争，社会偏见也起了一定作用。也就是说，如果能建立一个两性更加平衡的劳动力架构，那么会有更多的年轻人效仿，进入那些传统上由异性占据的行业，并觉得这样做会得到社会的认可。
我同意这些说法，但在劳动力架构中改变两性不平等和不平衡的局面不应该只限于大学。事实上，全社会，包括中小学教育都应该进行变革。此外，在大学里严格实行每个学科男女各占一半的做法(而这些学科可能现在男女比例为八比二)很有可能会导致许多非常能干且上进心强的男生被迫让位于一些在那些学科上不那么合格，而且可能也对将来从事这方面的工作兴趣不大的女生。
另一方面，如果那些男女比例严重不平衡的学科的招生人数的10%留给“少数派”性别，而且与此同时如果学术水准没有严重下降的话，那么我认为这种做法会让社会得益。
以上就是教育类雅思作文段落如何布局的详细内容，希望广大考生如愿考出自己理想的雅思成绩。
以上就是雅思大作文范文[教育类话题篇]的内容，希望看后有所帮助。