备考雅思写作考试，考生除了掌握写作技巧之外，每一次的考题回忆也是要看的，这样才会知道考试都考了哪些内容，心理也有一个准备。下面，我们一起来看22016年9月10日雅思写作考试真题答案解析吧。
TASK 2
Many customs and the traditional ways of behaviors are no longer relevant to the modern life and not worth keeping. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题干：很多习俗以及传统方式的行为都已经和现代生活不再相关，并且不值得保留。你是否同意?
这是一道单边讨论类的题目，话题是对待传统文化的恰当方式。当习俗和文化传统已经和现代生活脱节，是否还需要继续保留这些已经脱节的传统，还是从节约资源的角度果断加以摒弃。比起传统单边讨论类的题目来说，这道题的出题倾向性还是非常明显的，相信很多考生在拿到题目之后也会优先选择“不同意”的立场，强调保护这些文化风俗和传统的重要性。但是在题目已经明确给出客观条件“与现实生活脱节”的前提下，如何继续巩固保护传统的重要性这一核心观点，将是这篇作文的论述关键。
其实对待这道题目，论述的重点不在于“与现实脱节”，而是在于and后面的“not worth keeping”：可以把逻辑的重心放在“即便是已经与现实脱节，我们是否应该果断摈弃这些传统，还是能够将这些传统加以修正和改造，以适应崭新的社会形态”，如果能够将立场转向这个方向，不仅打开了论述的瓶颈，还能够将整体的立意提升至一个高度。
同意：
1. 继续保持这些脱节的传统文化会造成社会资源的浪费
2. 影响人们工作、生活的效率
3. 影响下一代对客观世界的理解和认识
反对：
1. 是对于国家价值观、文化的传承
2. 对部分传统风俗和行为的摒弃会波及到相关领域，带来负面影响
3. 可以经过适当的改造，更加适应现代社会的特色
下面这篇例文采取的是主体段三段式偏向型结构
1. 造成社会资源的浪费
2. 是国家价值观、文化的传承
3. 但可以经过适当改造，更加适应现代社会
The ever-changing pace of contemporary society has already imposed drastic influences on all walks of residential life, among which the preservation of conventions and customs are no exception. Some people claim that it is not compulsory to maintain those outdated traditions, which I am strongly against.
Certain amounts of social resources, namely governmental funds, labor force and research investments may be wasted if keeping protecting those impractical traditional behaviors. Clinging to conventions that are no longer valid, both the government and citizens need to spare an abundance of time and energy on relative cultivating deeds and spiritual teachings of those customs, which are seemingly of no use for the guidance of contemporary social life. Without clear planning or allocation, those invalid deeds may even trigger dissatisfaction among citizens.
The inheritance and popularization of national value and morality, however, should never be overlooked when taking the aforementioned issue into consideration. As the carrier of history and civilization generated in different periods of time, simply abandoning those conventions may result in the division of history or even lack of certain historical knowledge in the long run. When future siblings no longer understand the traditional values and morality that the older generation firmly adhere to, misunderstandings among different age groups may also arise.
What is more, under some adaptation in accordance of modern social circumstances, it is not impossible for those traditional habits and customs to be revitalized and renovated. What those conventions really weigh is not just confined to the mere behaviors and superficial forms, but the thoughts and ideology that unite the whole society. The mere change of manifestation pattern may also evoke a wider range of curiosity among the public, just like what has happened to the adaption of carved wooden printing pictures.
In conclusion, although some traditions have lost parts of their practical value, it is still hasty to give up them instantly.