GRE写作大全范文整理

2022-06-04 07:46:38

  

  1

  

  Topics in the following list may appear in your actual test. You

  should become familiar with this list before you take the GRE-AWA

  test. Remember that when you take the test you will not have a

  choice of topics. You must write only on the topic that is assigned to

  you.

  2

  The Pool of Issue Topics

  Present your perspective on the issue below, using relevant reasons and/or examples

  to support your views.

  Issue 1

  "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose

  views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."

  Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in common than from those whose

  ideas contradict ours? The speaker daims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause

  stress and inhibit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, in

  my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than

  from people whose ideas are in accord with our own.

  Admittedly, under some circumstances disagreement with others can be counterproductive

  to learning. For supporting examples one need look no further than a television set. On today's

  typical television or radio talk show, disagreement usually manifests itself in meaningless

  rhetorical bouts and shouting matches, during which opponents vie to have their own message

  heard, but have little interest either in finding common ground with or in acknowledging the

  merits of the opponent's viewpoint. Understandably, neither the combatants nor the viewers

  learn anything meaningful. In fact, these battles only serve to reinforce the predispositions and

  biases of all concerned. The end result is that learning is impeded.

  Disagreement can also inhibit learning when two opponents disagree on fundamental

  assumptions needed for meaningful discourse and debate. For example, a student of

  paleontology learns little about the evolution of an animal species under current study by

  debating with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution

  to begin with. And, economics and finance students learn little about the dynamics of a

  laissez-faire system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centrv2ized power should

  control all economic activity.

  Aside from the foregoing two provisos, however, I fundamentally disagree with the speaker's

  claim. Assuming common ground between two rational and reasonable opponents willing to

  debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate. Indeed it is

  primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal,

  community, or global level.

  At the personal level, by listening to their parents' rationale for their seemingly oppressive

  rules and policies teenagers can learn how certain behaviors naturally carry certain

  undesirable consequences. At the same time, by listening to their teenagers concerns about

  autonomy and about peer pressures parents can learn the valuable lesson that effective

  parenting and control are two different things. At the community level, through dispassionate

  dialogue an environmental activist can come to understand the legitimate economic concerns

  of those whose jobs depend on the continued profitable operation of a factory. Conversely, the

  latter might stand to learn much about the potential public health price to be paid by ensuring

  job growth and a low unemployment rate. Finally, at the global level, two nations with opposing

  political or economic interests can reach mutually beneficial agreements by striving to

  understand the other's legitimate concerns for its national security, its political sovereignty, the

  3

  stability of its economy and currency, and so forth.

  In sum, unless two opponents in a debate are each willing to play on the same field and by

  the same rules, I concede that disagreement can impede learning. Otherwise, reasoned

  discourse and debate between people with opposing viewpoints is the very foundation upon

  which human knowledge advances. Accordingly, on balance the speaker is fundamentally

  correct.

  以上就是为大家整理的“GRE写作大全范文整理”,希望通过上述内容的学习,大家能够更好地备考GRE考试,在接下里的考试中取得更好地成绩,更多精彩内容请持续关注本频道的更新!


考试安排