GRE Argument 第91题写作题目及满分范文分享

2022-06-08 08:19:54

  写作题目及满分范文。

  先来了解一下GRE Argument 第91题的写作题目:

  Arg-74The president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, made the following recommendation to the college's governing committee:

  "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially."

  接下来小编将为大家介绍一下GRE Argument 91写作范文,一起来了解一下该题目的写作思路及内容。

  In this memo Grove College's administration recommends preserving its tradition of admitting only female students. The administration admits that most faculty members are in favor of a co-educational policy but the administration defends its recommendation by citing a student government survey in which 80% of student respondents and more than 50% of alumni respondents reported that they favor the current policy. The administration reasons that preserving the status quo would improve student morale and help ensure continued alumni donations to Grove. While the argument seems sensible, it is flawed in several critical respects.

  First, the statistical reliability of the survey itself comes into question. If a disproportionate number of the survey's respondents were newer students, then the survey results would distort the student body's opinion as a group. With respect to the alumni survey, perhaps fewer alumni who donate substantial sums to Grove responded to the survey than other alumni did. If so, then the survey results would distort the comparison between the total amounts of future donations. Besides, the memo provides no information about what percentage of Grove's students and alumni responded to the surveys.

  Secondly, the administration hastily assumes that Grove's alumni, as a group, would be less inclined to donate money if Grove begins admitting male students. This aspect of Grove's admission policy is only one of many factors that might affect alumni donations. For example, since Grove's faculty are generally in favor of changing the policy, perhaps the change would improve faculty moral and therefore the quality of instruction would increase. Perhaps, in the case of overall academic improvement (which could hypothetically occur as a result of the change) alumni would be even more included to offer financial support. So, if the particular alumni who are in a position to make the largest contributions are presented with an argument that establishes a link between faculty morale and overall improvement, an increase in donations by these individuals could occur.

  Finally, the administration's argument that student morale would improve under the status quo is logically unsound in two respects. First, the administration provides no reason why morale would improve, as opposed to remaining at its current level, if the status quo is simply maintained. Second, the administration cannot really predict how the morale of the student body would be affected by a policy change.

  In sum, the recommendation to maintain the status quo, while it may be a reasonable recommendation, is based on an unsound argument. To better assess the argument an audience would need to be offered detailed information about the two surveys to determine whether the respondents as groups were representative of their respective populations. Further, to bolster the argument for its recommendation, the administration must provide better evidence—perhaps by way of a reliable alumni survey that takes into account respondents' financial status and history of donations in order to determine whether a policy shift would cause them to increase, decrease or leave their donation amounts the same.

  以上是小编为大家带来的关于GRE Argument 第91题写作题目及满分范文的介绍,希望能够对大家更好的备考GRE写作有帮助。

考试安排