issue:
Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Althoug we should always fund the kind of research that have predictable and significant benefit to our society and put them as the first priority, we should also fund those with less clear consequences if we have the resources and money to do so.
Clear: reduce the emmsion of the heat trapping gas to prevent global warming. Heat, fire, rising sea, melting ice burger. Unpredictable climate chang that lead to severe drought in a area but flood in another.
extinct animals unclear not fund; cancer ,fund
in the air-
Writea response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
argument:
The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.
"During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant,
where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the
argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
以上就是关于2018年最新gre写作预测，想了解更多考试相关的题目或资讯都可以咨询