下面tpo41综合写作题目原文及范文赏析，
TASK 1 Integrated Writing
Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the environment and suggest that the United States government should create new, much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash.
However, representatives of power companies take the opposite view: they argue that new regulations are unnecessary and might actually have negative consequences. They use the following arguments to support their position
Regulations Exist
First, power company representatives point out that effective environmental regulations already exist. For example, one very important regulation requires companies to use liner—special material that prevents coal ash components from leaking into the soil and contaminating the surrounding environment. Companies that dispose of coal ash in disposal ponds or landfills must use liner in every new pond or landfill they build.
Concerns About Recycling Coal Ash
Second, some analysts predict that creating very strict rules for storing and handling coal ash might discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products. Currently, a large portion of coal ash generated by power plants is recycled: it is used, for example, in building materials such as concrete and bricks. Recycling coal ash reduces the need to dispose of it in other ways and presents no environmental danger. However, if new, stricter rules are adopted for handling coal ash, consumers may become concerned that recycled coal ash products are just too dangerous, and may stop buying the products.
Increased Cost
Finally, strict new regulations would result in a significant increase in disposal and handling costs for the power companies—perhaps as much as ten times the current costs Power companies would be forced to increase the price of electricity, which would not be welcomed by the general public.
Directions
You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
Essay Topic
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.
You must finish your answer in 20 minutes
TASK 2 Independent Writing
Directions
Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words.
Question:
Essay Topic
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
本文是托福tpo41综合写作题目原文及范文赏析。
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
材料要点重现：lecture中教授的观点是新的更严格的规则是非常有必要的。原因有三点，第一是现有的规则并不完善。第二是更严格的规则并不意味着消费者就不会使用回收的煤灰产品。第三是煤灰储存成本的增加平摊到每个消费者身上之后就会非常的小。
高分词汇：effective, disposal, discourage, acceptable
范文：
The reading mainly talks about that the new regulations of coal ash are unnecessary. However the listening challenges what are stated in the passage by providing three strong reasons.
Firstly, in the reading, it is said that the effective environmental regulations already exist. In contrast, the listening holds a view that the regulations we have now are not sufficient. For example, the harmful chemicals from coal ash leaked into groundwater and contaminated drinking water. So we need stricter new rules to prevent environmental damage at all coal ash disposal sites.
Secondly, the passage asserts that creating too strict rules for storing and dealing with coal ash might discourage the recycling of it into other products. However, the professor maintains an opposite opinion that stricter rules doesn’t mean that consumers won’t use recycled coal ash products anymore. Take mercury as example, it’s been successfully and safely recycled for over 50 years and it receives little concerns.
Finally, the author of reading passage believes that strict new regulations would increase the cost of disposal and handling for the power companies. On the other hand, the professor disagrees it with the point that the result is worth the extra cost. To state it more clearly, it would increase the average consumer’s electricity bill by only about one percent which is totally acceptable to have a cleaner environment.
以上的资料是托福tpo41综合写作题目原文及范文赏析，根据这些题目进行分析，希望对大家备考会有帮助!