为了提高
In some countries people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
Not allowing smoking in public places and office buildings is a very good public regulation. I believe this for several reasons. Not only will banning smoking improve people’s health, it will also increase worker productivity and reduce workplace and public conflicts.
We all know smoking is not healthy. Unfortunately, when smokers are able to smoke in public buildings, they can cause other people to be sick. They may work with people who are allergic to tobacco smoke, for example. In these cases, non-smokers have no choice but to quit their jobs. They can only endure the smoke, which is unfair. Of course, banning smoking in public buildings and offices will please non-smokers. It will also improve the smokers’ health. They will have fewer opportunities to smoke, so they will smoke fewer cigarettes.
Banning smoking in office buildings can also increase worker productivity. Smokers won’t interrupt their work all the time to leave their workspace and smoke. There will also be fewer worker absences. When smokers decrease the number of cigarettes they smoke, they will get fewer smoking-related illnesses.
Finally, it is a good idea to ban smoking in public places and office buildings because a ban can reduce conflicts. Non-smokers tend to get annoyed and jealous because smokers have an excuse to take frequent breaks. The most significant conflict, however, is over whether smokers have a right to smoke in public. As we have already seen, non-smokers feel they are not always given a choice. If smoking in public is allowed, they will be forced to breathe harmful air. The conflict is that both feel entitled to either the smoking behavior or the right to breathe clean air.
It seems clear that banning smoking in public places and office buildings is a good idea. It will reduce conflict and increase productivity. It will also benefit the health of both smokers and non-smokers alike. I believe that just about anything that improves our health is a good idea!
满分要素剖析：
一、 语言表达
1、Not only will banning smoking improve people’s health, it will also increase worker productivity and reduce workplace and public conflicts. 这句话里使用了not only, but also的结构，并且将全半部分做否定前置处理，后接倒装句，这是一个非常实用也会经常用到的结构。
2、Non-smokers tend to get annoyed and jealous because smokers have an excuse to take frequent breaks. 首先tend to表示倾向，get annoyed表示烦恼，不高兴，have an excuse有借口做…， take a break休息。这些结构都是比较实用的结构。
3、The conflict is that both feel entitled to either the smoking behavior or the right to breathe clean air. be entitled to表示有权利做…，可以代替常用的have the right to do。either or表示两者之间的某一个，否定形式是neither nor。
二、 逻辑结构
本文从三个方面，即健康，工作和减少争执说明了公共场所禁烟令带来的好处。公共场所禁烟会对吸烟者起到一定的抑制作用，对不吸烟和吸烟的人群来说，都是减少吸入有害气体的有效措施;另外公共场所禁止吸烟还会减少因吸烟而导致的时间浪费，提高工作效率;最后，在两个对立人群之间存在的权利之争，禁令会以明文规定的形式形成定论。全文以总分总的结构架构论述，开头和结尾相互照应，分论点采用了分总和总分形式交叉的结构，针对不同的情况提供了不同的思维组建模式。
版权声明：本文系网独家稿件，版权为网所有。转载须注明来源及作者，否则必将追究法律责任。
微信扫描下方二维码，第一时间知晓托福考试真题预测及解析，还有北美留学最新动态喔~(微信号：toefl120)!