2014年6月21日，希望对各位考生的备考有所帮助，祝每位烤鸭考试顺利，都能取得好成绩！
综合写作：| Topic议题 | ||
| The TLP phenomenon | ||
| Reading | Listening | |
| Thesis总论点 | Three hypotheses. |
Against. 反对 |
|
Sub-point 1 分论点1 |
并非真实的现象，而是observational error | 如果instrument design引起的问题，那么这个现象应该randomly发生，但是所有被spot的现象出现在月球表面的两个location |
|
Sub-point2 分论点2 |
光来自meteor striking | Meteor striking的光只能维持一秒钟，但是TLP维持了20分钟。虽然流星雨meteor showers能维持很久，但是当TLP被发现的时候月球上并没有流星雨 |
|
Sub-point3 分论点3 |
月球表面有发光的岩石 | 岩石虽然能发光，但是他们的光线很弱，研究人员一般再晚上观察，本身不发光的月球会反射的sunlight比rock的光要更明亮，所以人们观察不到。就好像再power light面前看不到candle的光。 |
The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel. 2013.4.27 NA
A Traffic congestion is becoming an enormous problem in urban areas nowadays. As incomes rise, cars become more affordable, and more and more people rely on them to get to work, city roads are becoming clogged with commuters during morning and evening rush hours. One proposed solution is to turn driving during rush hour into a privilege that must be bought. While there are certain downsides to this idea, I think it has some merit.
One advantage of this system is that it would help the environment by reducing fuel consumption. Many who commute by car do not actually need to. They just prefer it because it saves them from having to squeeze up against other people on the bus or subway. But if driving during peak traffic hours became more expensive, it would encourage more commuters to use public transportation systems, thereby largely reducing per capita gasoline usage. As a result, air pollution would be reduced a great deal, and everybody could enjoy cleaner air.
Another advantage of this system is that it could serve as a large source of funding for the government for developing infrastructure. While many would likely switch over to public transportation under such a scheme, inevitably there will also be many who choose to pay for the privilege of driving to work. With this steady stream of income, the government can spend more money on developing roads and additional public transportation infrastructure in order to lessen congestion and pollution even further. As time goes on, more efficient public transportation systems can be put in place, and eventually, driving privileges during rush hour will not have to be taxed because most people will want to use subways or buses anyway.
Of course, such a system is not without flaws, especially in the early stages of its implementation. One issue is that it would be difficult to ensure fairness. Some people have no choice but to commute by car because there are no bus or subway stations where they live. For these people, the fee would be unfair. Another issue is setting the appropriate prices. If they are too high, public transportation systems could be overwhelmed by the influx of new passengers. If they are too low, traffic may hardly decrease. The first issue might be addressed if the government coordinated with companies to verify work and residence addresses. Those who have to commute to or from areas without public transportation access can be exempt from paying for driving privileges. The second issue could be resolved by setting a low starting price, and then gradually adjusting upwards until a “sweet spot” is found. Even if the price starts too low, the worst thing that could happen is that traffic levels stay the same.
Overall, though using fees to discourage peak-hour driving has its shortcomings, the advantages seem to outweigh these issues. With some time and effort, such a scheme could lead to a cleaner and more efficient commuting experience.