2017年6月24日雅思写作真题解析及参考范文!本场雅思写作考试中小作文和大作文考到哪些内容?下面
小作文：十六至二十五岁女性观看运动和参加运动的不同比例，柱状图
题目：The chart below shows the percentage of female afed 16-25 in a particular country who participate in sports,conpared with the percentage of people who watch them
大作文：所有government funding只能用来作为奖学金，学校其他的funding只能来源于私人组织或学费
题目：Government funding should only provide scholarships for the best students. All other funding of universities should come from student fees and private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
参考范文：
6分：支持奖励优秀学生1.可以培养人才，将来为社会做贡献。但是对其他同学来说不公平。2.资金源于私人机构不能覆盖到每一个学生，并且贷款和还款有附加条件，给学生带来压力。3.容易造成贫富差距拉大，不利于社会公平。
There has always been a consensus of opinion about who should pay for elementary or secondary education, but when it comes to higher education, a controversial discussion has arisen. Some claim that government aid should only be offered to the top students as a scholarship and universities get their funding from student fees and private organizations. But I cannot agree with this argument.It is absolutely right for the government to provide financial incentive to college students on merit-basis so as to encourage excellence and cultivate talents. These top students have substantial potential to become elites in every walk of life in the future and make significant contribution to their society. In this sense, such investment is most worthwhile because the most profit may be reaped in a few years. However, this benefit excludes the poor who have not demonstrated outstanding academic performance. They would be missed out without easy access to financial aid, which is unfair to them and a waste to the society.When private organizations are the only financial source, the students in need would be put in unfair and dangerous situation. Though many private employers recognize higher education and set aside money to help with students to accomplish their study, the truth is the grants cannot cover everyone. Some of them claim repayment and some attach conditions to their grants. There must be some those economically disadvantageous students who are not qualified for any grants. In this case, social egalitarianism is impaired and wealth gap is broader.In conclusion, mainly depending on students fees and private organization would lead higher educational institutes to ignore the poor. Turning to private organizations is an option, but should not be the only channel for financial aids. At the bottom line, the government should guarantee equal educational opportunities and social status mobility.