雅思写作考试前，怎能少一份机经资料。接下来小编为大家带来了2019年3月14日雅思写作小范围机经预测【题目+范文】，缩小了范围更加方便大家进行针对性的冲刺复习，接下来具体看看2019年3月14日雅思写作小范围机经有哪些题目。
1. Some people believe the best way to produce a better society is to ensure there is only a small difference between the earnings of the richest and the poorest. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people maintain the view that the smaller the gap between the rich and the poor, the happier the society becomes. However, in my view, this is not always the case.
Admittedly, when the gap between the rich and the poor is small, people will have less sense of deprivation when comparing their own wealth with that of others. Nevertheless, smaller gap does not necessarily bring more happiness to the society. This is the conflict between the size of the economy and the distribution of social wealth quite common in economics. If a country is trapped in poverty and decides not to develop for fear of expanding the income gap, then people will enjoy more equality but less wealth and happiness. Besides, if the income gap becomes too small, the motivation for people to work hard in order to move up the social ladder and earn higher salaries will decrease. This may encourage laziness, thus hampering social development.
In addition, merely narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor fails to ensure social happiness. Other things like improving social facilities, well-fare system and providing more care to the general public will be more efficient to raise people's sense of happiness. Only by focusing on the well-being of our people so that the sick is treated, the old are cared and the young are educated can we build a more harmonious society.
In conclusion, narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor can reduce people's sense of deprivation. Nevertheless, this way alone cannot ensure a happier society. What we really need to consider is how to improve the well-being of our people instead of just thinking about how to drag down the gap.
It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
"Claustrophobia” is recently a word that is not stranger to the people living in big cities, which describes a newly found psychological disease. People who have claustrophobia usually find it depressed and unbearable to stay in a confined place for a long time due to different reasons. However, the problem is that most of us do have to stay indoor (office, workshop, classroom, etc.) for most of the time of the life. Therefore, it is of great necessity to welcome more large public places like parks and squares where the citizens can get close to the nature and get rid of the pressure in working or studying time.
The large public spaces, first and foremost, provide a regular way for the local people to do things of all kinds more than their work. Sports like jogging or playing badminton, which cannot usually be realized indoor, will certainly become one of the best choice for the young and the old in spare time to get refreshed after a whole day’s heavy workload. Additionally, parks with plants are also somewhere for people to have a bite to eat during the break while they are busy, probably meeting someone interesting. Last but not the least, establishing as many as those large public places, the image of the city will be laddered up for the garden is no doubt to be carefully attended. It should be always cherished for the city people to have more green plants.
However, it does not mean those places are without any disadvantages. A recent case centered on the riot instigated by a gang of terrorists in the commercial street of Changsha: leading to several death. It is always those densely populated public places that become the target of terrorists.
In conclusion, it is a great policy for governments to set up as many large public places as possible.
Some people believe that only students with best academic should be reward, some other people think it is more important to reward students with improvement. Discuss and give your opinion.
Traditionally, the school would reward top students with the highest scores or best performance, but some people believe that the reward should be granted to students who have made considerable progress. In this essay, I will discuss this issue from both sides. It is quite reasonable to reward those excellent students because they deserve the prize. The number of prizes is limited, so they should be given to those really outstanding students. This would encourage a sense of competition between students, as they know they need to become the best to get recognized by other people. The top students would set a good example for other students and the award would become an incentive for students to study hard and excel in their study.
However, some people believe the competition between children may lead to pressure, which is not good for children's psychological health. It is impossible for everyone to take the first place in an exam, so the reward system should be revised. If we can reward those students who show obvious progress in their study and behavior, even the “worst” student would have the motivation to change, and this would help students develop a positive attitude to study and life.
In my opinion, the purpose of education is to tap the students potential and create an environment in which every student can fully develop their talents In this sense, it is more important to praise and reward students who have made improvement than those who are the best. Teachers and parents should make children understand that life is not a competition with others, but a journey of self-improvement.
......
以上是小编为大家带来的2019年3月14日雅思写作小范围机经预测【题目+范文】资料，希望可以帮助各位考生顺利的通过这场雅思考试。