2016年9月10日下午
2016年9月10日下午托福综合写作真题 space-based solar panels 是否好用
Topic 议题:space-based solar panels | ||
Reading | Listening | |
Thesis 总论点 | Space-based solar panels are better | Earth-based solar panels are better |
Sub-point 1 分论点1 |
The space-based solar panels can capture more energy for without the blockage of the earth’s atmosphere they can absorb more sun energy. | They can not gather more energy in the long term. When they have some problem functioning, due to the fact that people should be sent to the space to fix them, the cost and the time is far from plausible. Therefore, the time when they can work well to absorb energy is not very long. |
Sub-point2 分论点2 |
They can be exempted from meteoroid impacts for they can more easily detect meteoroids. | Despite of little chance of meteoroid impacts, there are space dusts which can cause huge damage to them. The space dusts are such tiny particle that they can be hardly detected. What’s more, their speeds are so fast that they can cause intensive heat which will definitely impair the panels. |
Sub-point 3 分论点3 |
They are environment-friendly, posing no harm to the earth. | The space-based panels depend on beams to transmit the energy to the earth, which will damage the ozone layer. In such situation, ultraviolet rays will directly penetrate the atmosphere, harming the human and animals on the earth and also leading to the decrease of the crop production. |
Sample answer:
In the lecture, the professor refutes against the view raised in the reading that space-based solar panels are better than earth-based solar panels.
Firstly, the reading holds that the space-based solar panels can capture more energy for without the blockage of the earth’s atmosphere they can absorb more sun energy. However, the professor refutes that they can not gather more energy in the long term. When they have some problem functioning, due to the fact that people should be sent to the space to fix them, the cost and the time is far from plausible. Therefore, the time when they can work well to absorb energy is not very long.
Secondly, the reading claims that they can be exempted from meteoroid impacts for they can more easily detect meteoroids. But the professor disagrees with this by suggesting that despite of little chance of meteoroid impacts, there are space dusts which can cause huge damage to them. The space dusts are such tiny particle that they can be hardly detected. What’s more, their speeds are so fast that they can cause intensive heat which will definitely impair the panels.
Finally, in the reading passage, it indicates that they are environment-friendly, posing no harm to the earth. In contrast, the professor holds that the space-based panels depend on beams to transmit the energy to the earth, which will damage the ozone layer. In such situation, ultraviolet rays will directly penetrate the atmosphere, harming the human and animals on the earth and also leading to the decrease of the crop production.
2016年9月10日下午托福独立写作真题:
作文题目: |
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? primary school is considering spend more time on teaching young student(5-11) technology(like computer)than teaching music and art |
题型类别: | 同不同意类 |
题材类别: | 利弊类 |
写作思路: | 给小孩在学校是教学科技术好,还是音乐艺术好,显然这题给的小孩年龄是5-11岁,这类小孩现在受到电脑的荼毒太多了,缺乏的就是音乐艺术教育。所以这道题是‘不同意’好写多了。先写电脑技术对这个年龄段小孩的坏处。再写多教音乐美术的好处。 |
写作指导: |
要多教音乐美术: technology(like computer)对这个段的孩子不仅没有太大的实际作用而且会有更多的负面影响。这个段的孩子没有很好的自控能力以及对这个世界的正确认知,学会了电脑技术后会很容易沉迷在其中,或玩游戏,或看电视。更甚者,会被电脑上不良信息侵害思想。 音乐美术可以发展孩子的想象力和创造力。不想其他学科,有相对固定的答案,例如数学有正确的答案,历史有既定的事实,音乐美术给了孩子们更多自由挥发的空间,尤其是美术,可以天马行空。 给孩子的未来更多可能。每个孩子的天赋是不一样的,有些擅长学术性的,有些擅长运动,有些擅长音乐美术。从小给孩子多方位的发展空间,可以让孩子的未来更开心,有更多选择。在现在社会,美术和音乐都可以是非常成功的事业。 (放松学习压力) |
2016年9月10日托福独立写作范文
The question of “ what is the most important subject or skill the elementary schools should teach? ” has never failed to attract attention from educators, school administrators and even politicians especially when it comes to subjects like technology, or music and art. Some argue that school should spend more time teaching technology than music and art. Personally, I am not in favor of this position based on the following reasons.
Admittedly, with the advent of internet and state-of-art gadgets like laptop, tablets, being able to use computers skillfully is being considered as a valuable quality. However, early exposure to computers and other kinds of technological products might bring lots of risks and problems to kids’ future development. Recently research by National Society of Psychiatrists shows that exposure to computers at an early age leads to addiction to computers when they grow older and obviously spending too much time in front of the computer can pose a threat to kids’ health, to be more specific, it leads to neck problems, nearsightedness, backache and even childhood obesity. Moreover, instead of getting addicted to playing on-line games and watching meaningless videos, kids should have spent more time focusing on their academic study, or even learning how to appreciate artwork or music. Indeed, spending more time learning art and music not only benefits the kids, but also it is conducive the community as whole.
First off, learning art and music at an early age helps to develop creativity and make the kids more imaginative. Actually, lots of scientific research in the psychological field shows that early exposure to art and music not only boosts academic achievement but also promotes creativity, self-confidence and school pride; kids who spend more time in learning art and music end up having higher analytical thinking and reasoning skills than kids who don’t.
Additionally, spending more time teaching kids music and art can can benefit the whole community. Music and art are a very important part of people’s lives. They are necessary for people to express their emotions, like happiness, sorrow, and even anger regardless of cultural background, ethnicity, age and even gentle. It is very urgent to spend more time teaching kids knowledge about art and music since they bring change, facilitate innovation and help to unite the community. They are the reminder of the past and maker of tomorrow, they also help to convey ideas and different perspectives. More importantly, art and music have great cultural significance, by learning art and music kids will have a strong sense of cultural identity and sense of belonging to community, eventually the traditional values and culture can be passed down to the younger generation.
To conclude, it is more advisable to spend more time teaching kids art and music than technology since not only can art and music benefit the individual kid but also it benefits the community as a whole.