下面是今天
10月3日SAT考试亚洲卷的写作题目是：
Should people's achievements be judged according to how much they help others?
Should people be treated according to what they are capable of achieving instead of what they have actually done? (2012年1月)
Should leaders be judged according to how well they treat people? (2012年12月)
本次写作为经典题目变形考察。对于该题目的分析在理解上需要能够引申到名人效应上，同时对于思路方面需要敢于创新。
这里可以联想到名人类话题，也就是挑战权威类话题。只是这里我们可以按照类似的思路，如果原题干成立，可以推导出只要是名人就不应该挑战。因此这里写不支持的观点。比如亚里士多德对社会的贡献很大，并不意味着他就没有任何漏洞，最后也是被哥白尼发现了学术上的漏洞。
总的来说，本次作文在审题上偏难，需要各位考生能够把握本质上只是对于挑战权威以及名人效应的变形考察。
1、Assignment里面没有出现生僻或者难以理解的单词，这样的情况下，学生跑题的可能性大大降低。
2、这次的题目的问法是我们常见的，应不应该，我们直接回答yes or no 就可以了，对于这种直抒胸臆型的题目，学生不陌生，因为写作部分放在第一个section考，在心理程度方面，十月的考生是占优势的。
3、Should people’s achievements be judged according to how much they help others?人们的成就应不应该根据他帮助他人的多少来评判?
2015年10月3日SAT写作真题及范文：
Capitalism offers us a wonderful way to quantify our achievements. However, with regard to how much “value” we should attach to these achievements, opinions are just diversified. In my view, the best way for us to evaluate individual successes is to look at it from how much degree it helps others, for this is what capitalism lies upon --- the division of labor.
Despite all the important roles assumed by each individual in their successes, any achievements, regardless of their influence on the society or what field in which they are made, should be considered to have been constituted by the joint efforts of the entire society. Thus, in attaching a value to each of these successes, an important criterion should be the degree to which they can contribute to the well-being of the society.
相关推荐: